So last week we had to read an article by Wilson and I must say I found it rather interesting. We had to choose a line/excerpt from the article and talk about it. I liked this activity so much that I wanted to include it in my journal. Below is the excerpt I chose and my explanation as to its importance to me.
"Consistent theoretical grounding is only possible or desirable where participants share a common ideology. Examples might include the military, a small company, or a charter school. But even in these cases, constituencies have this maddening tendency to diverge off the beaten path; to seek innovation and change; to differ on even fundamental points. Resulting instructional designs are likely to be some sort of compromise, reflecting the diversity of the community. And rather than being seen as a weakness for lack of theoretical consistency, I tend to see such compromise as valuable reality checks" (Wilson, n.d., p. 7).
I found this excerpt to stand out the most for me as I constantly come across this in both my educational and professional life. In learning environments I tend to see that generally, most communities do attempt to utilize a common concept or try to generalize a theory to fit for everyone. While I can understand the implications for doing so, especially when looking at the given examples, it makes me wonder why we tend focus so much on applying a single/common theory when we as individuals are not one in the same. And even though most learning communities allow room for change and innovation, many still hold strong to a common theory across the board.
I also come across this in my daycare when managing my employees. I find myself trying to use a general theory of management practice when dealing with my employees and find myself getting frustrated when it seems as if I need to employ another theory because the current one isn't working for one or all of my employees. So what I like best about the excerpt in regards to my business is that he says to not look at it as a weakness but rather a reality check. A reality check because no matter how common the community, no one theory is going to work 100% of the time and it's okay to change it up a little. You don't have to abandon the theory in favor of a newer one, but altering it by allowing for change and innovation is best. Once you get past that, Wilson says you're beginning to account for people's needs.
Sunday, March 14, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)